Unnecessary Roughness

And so are you.
After all of the updates, analysis, and diatribes I’ve absorbed listening to hundreds of hours of sports radio, I’ve come to the following conclusion: Jimbo from Sheepshead Bay doesn’t know what the fuck he’s talking about, and neither do the rest of us.
It wouldn’t be a stretch to say that sports radio is the soundtrack of my life. I began listening to it in Seattle during my interminable commute, and now I tune in while cooking, showering, or otherwise engaged in the banalities of my homebound life. My local station of choice is 1050 ESPN, just as the marketers intended it. With its rap music lead-ins, pop culture savvy, and aggressively boisterous personalities, 1050 has positioned itself as an alternative to stodgy 660 WFAN, where every discussion invariably culminates in a lively game-by-game break down of Phil Rizzuto’s legendary 1950 season. With ESPN, on the other hand, every topic is destined to conclude with a hilarious crack about the Whizzinator. Pick your poison.
Why do I venture over into the rough and tumble world of AM radio when I could be spending my hard-earned leisure time basking in the nurturing hum of NPR? Well, it could be argued that through sports radio I am connected to the Bush-voting, blue collar, exurbanites with whom I might otherwise have little contact. Consider it my one small, David Eckstein-sized blow against the wall separating the red from the blue. Furthermore, while one might assume that my mind would be more fruitfully engaged by, say, Terry Gross’s in-depth interview with Tibet’s most heralded singing bowl player, sports are actually a more illuminating condensation of the zeitgeist. Sport reveals not only the unvarnished truth about contemporary economics, race relations, and class divisions, it also allows for the purest expression of humanity’s capacity for ruthlessness, valor, and grace.
All of the above defenses are potentially valid. In practice, though, modern-day sports are just another outlet for a listless and overindulged public to make uninformed and often hateful personal attacks on strangers. For every moment of on-field heroism (think Kirk Gibson’s walk-off) or off-field camaraderie (more man-to-man hugs were shared the night of Boston’s World Series clinch than in the entire history of Christopher Street) there are millions of petty swipes taken at athletes who were unable to keep their balance on the inhumanly high and precarious pedestals we’ve perched them on.
Perhaps the most vicious (and entertaining) purveyor of this brand of rado demagoguery is Jim Rome. With the help of his “clones,” he takes gleeful aim at the weakest Christians in the Coloseum, from soccer players to Wyatt Sexton to Ashlee Simpson. I recognize that most (but not all) of those pilloried are extremely well-compensated and voluntarily in the crosshairs of the public eye, but does that automatically free us from the bonds of basic human decency (this question applies to you, too, US Weekly readers)?
On a less highfalutin note, how informative is sports radio, and sports media in general? ESPN, in all of its engrossing, ADD friendly glory, spends 80% of its energies dissecting not the athletic merits of a given team or individual, but instead focuses on their inspiring childhood/criminal history/charitable foundation/contract dispute/devotion to fatherhood/latest paternity suit. How much does even the most informed fan actually know, the guy who spends half of the workday tweaking his fantasy team and every other night glued to the TV for the night’s game?
Take the Charlie Villanueva pick. The entire NBA punditry let out a thunderous gasp of horror at the news that the Toronto Raptors had mustered the temerity to defy conventional wisdom (which was concocted from the biased and under-researched opinions of 12 self-absorbed commentators and the millions of fans who depend on them). Answer me this: how can even the most ardent fan claim to know more about the needs of the Toronto Raptors than the management team who ultimately made the decision? Had they watched every game? Been in the locker room? Ridden the bus? Observed practices? Directed individual workouts? Consulted scouts? Met with the owner? All told, he has probably spent, on average, a few hours of his life watching Villanueva play and analyzing his skills. Maybe Chuck will be a bust; it’s all a crapshoot in the end. But should he make it, I’m sure the AM airwaves won’t be ringing with apologies from the contrite fan. Rafael from Little Neck has bigger things on his mind.


